Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
Topic Summary - Displaying 2 post(s).
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Mar 22nd, 2005 at 11:42am
  Mark & Quote
Congratulations on passing your NSA polygraph! As you may be aware, three is a "magic number" for the NSA polygraph unit, as it is the number of times that they may subject applicants to polygraph interrogations at their own discretion, without authorization from above. By routinely subjecting applicants to more than one polygraph session, they ensure full employment for themselves.

By the way, there is no evidence that more experienced polygraphers produce more accurate results than less experienced ones. One wouldn't expect more experienced astrologers to produce more accurate results than less experienced ones, either. Some polygraphers may be better interrogators, just as some astrologers might be more skilled in the art of cold reading. But the problem in both cases is that the methodology employed lacks any scientific underpinnings. Your sense that the NSA's polygraph screening policy is arbitrary is absolutely correct.
Posted by: Smitty
Posted on: Mar 21st, 2005 at 8:06pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Recently, I took the NSA polygraph for the third time.  I didn't expect to pass, but the examiner said the charts were clean this time.  That was a pleasant surprise, but I'm a bit perplexed.   

Granted, this time the examiner was more experienced, offered more reassurance, and explained what to do in more detail.  However it felt exactly the same way to me as the other times.

Oh well.  If I actually get the clearance I hope I don't have this much trouble in future check-ups.  I'll never blame anyone again for not wanting to take a polygraph, though.  It seems arbitrary.
 
  Top