Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
Topic Summary - Displaying 4 post(s).
Posted by: kenlt1
Posted on: Jan 21st, 2005 at 7:19am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Thanks for the quick replys, I'll keep you updated as to what happens if anything.
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jan 21st, 2005 at 7:01am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Generally, a failed polygraph alone is not considered to be probable cause to arrest someone, and, as mentioned polygraph results are generally not admissible as evidence in criminal cases.

In addition, the Employee Polygraph Protection Act prohibits private employers from taking adverse action against an employee solely on the basis of polygraph results (or the employees refusal to submit to a polygraph interrogation).
Posted by: anxietyguy
Posted on: Jan 21st, 2005 at 3:37am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Depends on your state but most polygraphs are not admissible in court. The only way he would be arrested is if he made an admisson during the polygraph. Although if he is terminated soly on the polygraph results he may have a valid civil suit against the company.

Anxiety
Posted by: kenlt1
Posted on: Jan 21st, 2005 at 2:42am
  Mark & Quote
My brother works for a moving company, during a recent move the owner claimed her ring which she left on a kitchen counter went missing in a housefull of movers and neighbors. Cops were called and they (the cops) asked my brother to come in for a polygraph.
The reason I think they asked him is hes covered in tattoos. There are no witnesses to any ring being taken. I told him not to take the test due to unreliable results. 
My brother said he didn't do it (take any ring) and didn't want to lose his job(this is his first steady job in years) and here in Fl small business owners can fire an employee for any reason. I didn't think this would be a reason but I do know of people that were fired for less. In any event he said he had no problem taking the test and ofcourse they told him he was found to be deceptive or I wouldn't be here.
My question is, I think they are just trying to see if he'll admit to taking it, but if the test really came up deceptive what can be done w/ it? Can he be arrested based soley on the test w/ no additional evidence?
Thanks for your help,
Ken
 
  Top