Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
Topic Summary - Displaying 2 post(s).
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Nov 16th, 2004 at 10:14pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
In agencies with polygraph screening programs, polygraphers do polygraph each other, but it is little more than a formality that is necessary to keep up appearances. When polygraphing other polygraphers, either a relevant/irrelevant or directed-lie technique may be used instead of a probable-lie CQT.

As for what it takes to become a polygraph "professional" on average it's about 8 weeks and several thousand dollars:

http://www.polygraph.org/schools.htm
Posted by: 1234554321
Posted on: Nov 16th, 2004 at 9:37pm
  Mark & Quote
So I'm brand new to the site and I've got an idea that I'm sure has been thought of before but I can't seem to find it in any previous discussion.  George's tag line ("Who will polygraph the polygraphers?") got me thinking.  What does it take to become a (certified, qualified, badge-carrying, whatever) polygraph examiner?

From what I understand, a standard question that's asked at the beginning of a polygraph is "What do you know about polygraphs?".  What if one were to be able to truthfully respond "Actually, I'm a certified polygraph examiner..." etc.?  

A story is told about John Napier, a famous scientist in the 16th century.  It's said that one of his servants was stealing from him.  So, he gathered all his servants together and told them that his black rooster would tell him which servant was stealing.  The servants were each sent, alone, into a darkened room with instructions to pat the waiting rooster on the back.  Unknown to the servants, Napier had covered the rooster with lampblack.  The guilty servant, afraid that he might be discovered, was the only one to return with clean hands.  What if one of the "servants" demonstrated that they had seen this trick before? 

It seems to me that the entire "validity" for polygraph results is based solely on the assumption that this <sarcasm> fantasitc contraption, which I can never understand, can somehow read my mind and will tell the minute I'm dishonest </sarcasm>.  Candidates are usually told "whatever you know about this machine is wrong".  What if they could show that they really do know how the machine works.  What if they were in on the secret.  What if the polygrapher knew they were testing one of their own?
 
  Top