Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
Topic Summary - Displaying 5 post(s).
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Oct 25th, 2004 at 8:30am
  Mark & Quote
Normally, the absence of a post-test interrogation is a good indication that one has passed. However, this is not necessarily the case with regard to FBI "re-tests."

While the FBI has not published information regarding the pass rate on "re-tests," feedback received by AntiPolygraph.org from numerous applicants suggests that the results of "re-tests" are almost always the same as the initial "test." I suspect that the FBI HQ polygraph unit correctly judges that it cannot afford to be seen reversing more than a few initial polygraph results, because to do so would call into question the reliability of their pseudoscientific technique.

As you may be aware, the FBI (specifically, the HQ polygraph unit) has lied in writing about the accuracy of the polygraph to its employees (who are now subject to periodic counterintelligence-scope polygraph screening), falsely claiming that "[c]urrent research continues to show that the polygraph is highly reliable and a valid technique." If the FBI were to reverse more than a handful of pre-employment polygraph results, it would expose the foregoing claim for the blatant falsehood that it is.

It is worth noting that when AntiPolygraph.org first went on-line (September 2000), the FBI very rarely granted "re-tests" to applicants. Now they are frequently granted, if the applicant requests it. But it appears that the purpose of granting re-tests is more to create the illusion of fairness than the reality (and perhaps to put the FBI in a better legal position to defend itself against future lawsuits such as those that are being litigated by Mark Zaid).

But let's keep our fingers crossed and hope for the best. Please let us know the result when you receive it.
Posted by: budo_otaku
Posted on: Oct 25th, 2004 at 4:25am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Does anyone know the pass rate on a retest ? And to all you experts, what do ya think did I pass or fail?
Posted by: budo_otaku
Posted on: Oct 22nd, 2004 at 11:25pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Yes I had an interview, from the start of my appeal process to the interview was about 3 months and then another month for the retest. The interview was pretty informal, we talked about my drug history or should I say the lack of and occasions that I had been around it such as parties ect.. Also to get this retest besides sending in my appeal letter- I kept calling my applicant coordinator and my HR person at my local office to find out the status of my case. I guess you could say that I bugged them alot.
Posted by: bunny
Posted on: Oct 22nd, 2004 at 7:44pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Did you have an interview before the re-test? If so, how long did you have to wait after the interview to find out if you were indeed given a re-test? Thanks!
Posted by: budo_otaku
Posted on: Oct 22nd, 2004 at 4:41am
  Mark & Quote
Just wanted to share my experience with you guys. I had my first poly a few months ago and it didn't go so well. I was interrogated for 3 hours over drug use and spying. Anyways I went through the process and finally got a retest. The retest was a total 180 from my first experience. There was no interrogation, the only thing I could think was the bad cop good cop routine. We talked for an hour about the areas that I failed; from that 6 questions were formed and I was hooked up to the box. We did three sets of the same questions with a little breather in between each. After that the polygrapher left the room for about 2min -- came back in and said looks like I have enough good information. There were no further?? about anything. At the point I was pretty good and was thinking that things were going good. The examiner told me that they do not score the retest - that they were sent to DC for a review and I should here something in a few weeks. I went out of there feeling like I passed, but you never know with these people. Anyone have any insight out there. Thanks
 
  Top