You can enhance your privacy when browsing and posting to this forum by using the free and open source Tor Browser and posting as a guest (using a fake e-mail address such as nobody@nowhere.com) or registering with a free, anonymous ProtonMail e-mail account. Registered users can exchange private messages with other registered users and receive notifications.
The California Supreme Court's key ruling in People v. Wilkinson is that "in light of the categorical prohibition on the admission of polygraph evidence in Penal Code section 351.1, the trial court did not err in declining to hold a Kelly/Frye hearing regarding the evidence proffered by defendant."
Posted by: George W. Maschke Posted on: Jul 29th, 2004 at 4:55pm
According to an articlepublished on the American Homeoweners Resource Center website, the California Supreme Court will today (29 July 2004) be issuing an opinion that has relevance to the admissibility of polygraph "evidence":
Quote:
PEOPLE v. WILKINSON S111028 (B145982; Los Angeles County Superior Court No. SA035468) Argued in San Francisco 5-05-04
This case presents the following issues: (1) Does the statutory scheme permitting battery on a custodial officer to be charged as a straight felony, a straight misdemeanor, or a felony/misdemeanor "wobbler" (see Pen. Code, §§ 243, 243.1) violate equal protection? (2) Was defendant entitled to a Kelly/Frye hearing (see People v. Kelly (1976) 17 Cal.3d 24; Frye v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1923) 293 F. 1013) regarding the admissibility of evidence of results of a polygraph examination, or is such evidence admissible only pursuant to a stipulation of the parties under Evidence Code section 351.1?