Quote:

I'm not the one hiding behind a pseudonym. I have the courage to post under my real name, unlike you. 

Quote:

There have been a number of well-written rebuttals to Michael Moore's distortions. The same cannot be said for The Lie Behind the Lie Detector and the rest of the information featured here on this site. Perhaps you would consider diverting some of the time you spend figuring out such snappy personal attacks and comebacks and using it to author such a rebuttal?

007 wrote on Jul 5^th, 2004 at 5:50am:


Absolutely right, it is Michael as I correctly named him on previous posts where I compared him to George,  and you are very sharp to also observe that he and George are almost identical twins.   And Michael, Gino, and George do have the same lack of respect for the facts too.   

Quote:


That's Michael Moore. His *other* movie is "Roger and Me"

You watch of lot of his movies? His fact checking is on a par with yours.

007

Quote:


Hey Gino, haven't heard from you for a long time.  Glad to see you crawled out from under your rock to defend your asshole buddy George.  But all a person has to do is to look at the pudgy picture that George plasters all over every one of his posts to see that he is as big a lard ass as Roger Moore.  But then facts have never played a large part in anything you write have they Gino baby?

Quote:

If that isn't the pot calling the kettle black, I don't know what is. You certainly seem to spend a lot of your time here. And your attempts to take on George's arguments with name calling and personal insults cannot be categorized as anything else but futile.

Quote:

If you have all that proof, why don’t you post it? Why waste all the time with the personal attacks then? Just rip apart this site apart with facts and proof. We’re all ears. 
 
As far as censorship goes, I don’t know of any other on-line message board with as much tolerance of an individual who continues to add nothing to the discussion and simply makes personal attacks against the operator of the site. On the bright side, your posts give neutral observers to this debate an insight into the behavior of polygraphers in a way that we could never could. 

Quote:

If audio and video were recorded during all polygraph examinations (as George has called for numerous times), and these tapes were made available to everyone interrogated, George would easily be able to refute silly charges like yours. 

Quote:

There you go with the name calling and personal attacks again. Moreover, you are lying as well. George Maschke is not overweight, and to my knowledge never has been. Yet another fabrication on your part. Why don’t you just admit that the information contained on this site makes you ANGRY and that you don’t know how to deal with it.   

[quote author=George W. Maschke link=board=federal;num=1088677907;start=0#13 date=07/04/04 at 12:46:27]


I have neither any desire nor any need to prove my truthfulness. 
quote]

That much is obvious.  And it is also obvious that you couldn't because you are in fact a liar and you are most certainly guilty of what you were accused of lying about on BOTH  of your failed polygraph exams.

Quote:


Actually you have devoted a signficant portion of your life to posting ad hominem attacks on this website over the past past two months or so. But you somehow haven't found the time to substantiate them.

Your failure to substaniate any of your allegations against me cannot be credibly attributed to concerns over wasting your time in a futile exercise.

Quote:


I have neither any desire nor any need to prove my truthfulness. Indeed, there is no way that anyone could prove one's truthfulness regarding the relevant questions that were the subject of my FBI and LAPD polygraph examinations. One cannot prove that one has never used or sold an illegal drug or that one has never disclosed classified information to an unauthorized person or had unauthorized contacts with a foreign intelligence service. But I made no admission(s) to any such conduct, and my DoD background investigation turned up no evidence that I had.

It is you who would have others believe that I have engaged in some (as yet unspecified) unethical conduct and lied (about something). Your continued failure to back up your accusations with any evidence whatsoever strongly suggests that you are talking through your hat.

Quote:



George, just because your life is spent in engaging in an exercise in futility, doesn't mean mine has to be.  If you want to prove your truthfulness (or more correctly lack thereof), why don't you tell us about all the things you admitted to during your polygraph examinations?

Quote:


Try me.

Quote:


George, is your head as thick as your ass?  I have already spoken to this, let me repeat what I told you before;  "There would be no point in doing that George, I could offer all the proof in the world and you would simply deny it or delete it.  But I still say you are a liar and worse.  And you know it as well as I do."

Quote:


You've accused me of lacking integrity, but can't support your accusation with any examples. You've accused me of being a liar, but can't point out any lies I've supposedly told. I leave it to others to decide who is full of what.

Quote:


One thing is sure George, no one could accuse a tub of lard like you of being and "empty vessel".  You are completely full of shit.

Quote:


You claim to be able to offer all the proof in the world, yet you haven't offered any at all. Empty vessels make the loudest noise.

Quote:


There would be no point in doing that George, I could offer all the proof in the world and you would simply deny it or delete it.  But I still say you are a liar and worse.  And you know it as well as I do.

Quote:


If you choose not be civil, then don't complain when your posts are deleted.

In your above post, you call me a liar. I challenge you to either back up this accusation with proof or to retract it. Specifically what lie(s) have I told?

I remind you that in a separate message thread, you accused me of "lacking integrity." But when I challenged you to support your accusation, for reasons you must surely know best, you chose not to do so.

Quote:



I will try to comply George, but I don't think I can be civil.  I mean when I'm dealing with liars, punks, and pompous bastards like you, only the strongest language adequately describes you.

Quote:


ISBS,

While this message board is not censored, it is not unmoderated. As I noted in a reply to you some three weeks ago, it is your lack of civility in multiple postings over an extended period of time that most made clear the need for a more robust moderation policy.

If you do not want to see your posts deleted, then please comply with AntiPolygraph.org's posting policy. Again, posts by polygraph proponents are welcome. It is lack of civility that may lead to a post being deleted.

Incidentally, someone registered the user name "I-Smell-BS" in May, but never posted using that name. This suggests that the purpose of this registration was simply to prevent you from using the name. That registration has been deleted, and you may now post as "I-Smell-BS" rather than "I-Smell-BS." or "I-Smell-BS-2."

Quote:


No, not mute, I have a lot to say and have posted quite a few times only to have George delete them or block me from his "free and open" board.  Do you suppose that says anything about your integrity George?  Probably not, according to you anyway.

I wonder if I-SMELL-BS is going to post anything about that case in here. He seems to like discrediting everything, except when is in the press or hard evidence comes, then he just goes mute, no opinion then.

Former FBI contract linguist and whistleblower Sibel Edmonds discussed her job in detail during a recent interview. Her experience will be of interest to anyone considering employment as an FBI linguist. See, "An Interview with Sibel Edmonds" by Christopher Deliso.