You can enhance your privacy when browsing and posting to this forum by using the free and open source Tor Browser and posting as a guest (using a fake e-mail address such as nobody@nowhere.com) or registering with a free, anonymous ProtonMail e-mail account. Registered users can exchange private messages with other registered users and receive notifications.
Military Rule of Evidence 707 establishes a blanket exclusion to the admission of polygraph evidence in courts martial, and I don't believe Nick can be lawfully ordered to submit to a polygraph interrogation in this case.
The main purpose for polygraphing Nick at this point would be to provide an opportunity for interrogating him without a lawyer, in hope of getting a confession (which would be admissible). Note that CID polygraphers do read this message board, and it is quite possible, if not probable, that your post, providing enough information to identify Nick, has been circulated to all CID polygraphers.
I think Nick would be wise to cancel his polygraph appointment and seek legal counsel from JAG.
Posted by: Torpedo Posted on: Mar 18th, 2004 at 6:01am
To answer your question...Yes....while no one can force "him" to take a polygraph examination. It would make no sense whatsoever to force someone to take such a test if they did not want to. CID is offering him a chance to help prove his professed innocence. Were he to pass the test, the convening authority MIGHT take that into consideration, but a lot has to do with the credibility of the person who identified "your friend" to the authorities and/or any other evidence in the case. As far as being charged?...makes no difference if he takes the examination or not. While the polygraph is not admissible. per se, under the MCM, there have been cases when a judge (or convening authority) sitting alone and weighing ALL of the evidence has dismissed charges where a suspect took and passed a properly administered government conducted polygraph examination. I have to tell you though, I found your comments interesting where you said that "your friend" has never been caught possessing or selling...and that he is most likely going to fail...were those slips of the tongue?..or do these statements reflect that this time he was caught. Your "friend", it would seem might be better off trying to negotiate a plea. You seem to feel, as I do, that he will fail the exam. Hopefully he isn't planning on doing anything foolish like atttempt countermeasures? Why make things worse.