You can enhance your privacy when browsing and posting to this forum by using the free and open source Tor Browser and posting as a guest (using a fake e-mail address such as nobody@nowhere.com) or registering with a free, anonymous ProtonMail e-mail account. Registered users can exchange private messages with other registered users and receive notifications.
But don't fall for the post-post exam interview, where you call and ask about the results. "We're still looking at a few questions, oh by the way, what were you thinking about on this question?" Say nothing, nothing that you can think of, and goodbye.
Posted by: Skeptic Posted on: Aug 14th, 2003 at 6:24pm
In The Lie Behind the Lie Detector, we mention that if you are subjected to a "post-test" interrogation, it is a good indication that you didn't pass. However, you received the bare minimum in the way of "post-test" questioning, and there was no accusation of deception with regard to any of the relevant questions.
I think it is likely that you passed. Polygraphers frequently avoid telling an examinee whether he/she passed, in case their reading of the charts is overruled by a supervisor.
I agree. It sounds to me like the polygrapher was taking a last stab at fishing for something before turning you loose.
Skeptic
Posted by: George W. Maschke Posted on: Aug 14th, 2003 at 8:24am
In The Lie Behind the Lie Detector, we mention that if you are subjected to a "post-test" interrogation, it is a good indication that you didn't pass. However, you received the bare minimum in the way of "post-test" questioning, and there was no accusation of deception with regard to any of the relevant questions.
I think it is likely that you passed. Polygraphers frequently avoid telling an examinee whether he/she passed, in case their reading of the charts is overruled by a supervisor.
Posted by: wadewe Posted on: Aug 14th, 2003 at 8:04am
I recently took a pre-employment polygraph for a police officer position. I had used marijuana a few times in high school and disclosed that on my questionnaire. The total time for the test was about two hours including the pre-test interview. I was run through two series of questions which consisted of ten questions each. At the end of the test the examiner said there was some issue in the area of drug use and asked what I was thinking about when asked about drugs. At no time was I accused of deception or lying. I made no further admission about drug use. I asked the examiner how I did and he said that he would have another examiner review the chart but that “you are on the right side of the page”, whatever that means.
The questions I have are; does that fact that he asked me what I was thinking about regarding a question constitute a post exam interview, and what do you think are my chances of passing the exam?