You can enhance your privacy when browsing and posting to this forum by using the free and open source Tor Browser and posting as a guest (using a fake e-mail address such as nobody@nowhere.com) or registering with a free, anonymous ProtonMail e-mail account. Registered users can exchange private messages with other registered users and receive notifications.
Both your questions started with "Did you use CM's to assist you in the exam while...."?
navc4 never once stated he used CM's yet both your questions related to them and nothing else. I took that to mean you had already made the assumption that is how he passed.
Maybe if you asked whether or not he used CM's period might have clarified things.
Posted by: True Dat Posted on: Aug 3rd, 2003 at 12:55am
I realize this thread has pretty much reached it logical conclusion with NAVC4's last post. However, I do take exception to your post insinuating I made a judgement regarding whether or not NAVC4 used CM's. Where in my post did you come up with that? I was simply asking if he/she used them. Period.
Posted by: navc4 Posted on: Aug 2nd, 2003 at 1:02am
Sorry Guest on taking so long to reply but I do have a family, and a job that as we all knows takes up a great deal of time.
Thanks Canadian Crusader, you hit the nail right on the head, I read TLBTLD and was faced with a big dilemma. Was I morally obligated to not utilize CM's even though I did not intend to lie? Should I put my future in the hands of an individual such as Saidme who advocates tell the truth and you will be fine? I did not want what happened to Human Subject to Happen To me.
So here it is. I practiced CM's and utilized them insure less of a chance of a false positive on the polygraph. And every relevent answer I gave was the truth
JohnBoy- took 2 weeks them to get back to me
(now donning flack jacket and crash helmet)
Posted by: True Dat Posted on: Aug 1st, 2003 at 11:04pm
Why do you instantly assume that he/she employed CM's. Navc4 said he/she used the info obtained from TLBTLD and the web page and passed the poly. Maybe Navc4 read TLBTLD, saw through the post test interrogation and negated any potential falsified confessions?
TLBTLD does not just teach CM's to pass your silly test.
Points to concider?
Posted by: guest Posted on: Aug 1st, 2003 at 6:14am
Armed with information obtained from all of the extremely intelligent users of Antiplolygraph.org and information provided in the book the lie behind the lie detector, I was successful in passing my pre-employment polygraph. Thank you all for helping me to obtain my dream career.
Good for you!
Despite being armed with that info, I was foolish enough to try to pass without resorting to CMs. One of the most stupid calls I've ever made -- and I've made my fair share.
Posted by: Saidme Posted on: Aug 1st, 2003 at 3:15am
Armed with information obtained from all of the extremely intelligent users of Antiplolygraph.org and information provided in the book the lie behind the lie detector, I was successful in passing my pre-employment polygraph. Thank you all for helping me to obtain my dream career.