Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
Topic Summary - Displaying 20 post(s).
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jul 12th, 2003 at 9:24am
  Mark & Quote
For an update on the Irondale scandal, see:

http://www.postherald.com/me071103.shtml

Here's an excerpt:

Quote:
Two Irondale City Council members want some answers -- and perhaps an investigation into their own Police Department. 

Councilman Simpson Berry said he has received many inquiries from Irondale residents after questions were raised about an incident in which police say they found a city councilman's son with 3 pounds of what officers believed was marijuana. The 19-year-old son has never been charged in the incident, police and court documents show. 

Berry, who said the city of Irondale also is being portrayed in a bad light on local talk radio stations, said he wants to put an end to the controversy by getting some questions answered. 

"We want the public to have correct information, and we want the correct information," Berry said Thursday. "Sometimes we can be blinded." 

Berry and Councilman Jack Boone called a public meeting for 4 p.m. today to discuss bringing in an outside person to investigate the Police Department. 

"There might be some things we all need to know and possibly consider bringing some additional experts in to look at this whole affair," Berry said. 

"Just from the council, city attorney and the mayor, we need some other people to come in ... and suggest to us some things that we can do and some things we should have done," Berry said. "Maybe some of us are a little too close to the situation."

...

Berry also said he wanted to discuss the demand by Mayor Allen Ramsey that city employees take lie-detector tests after a copy of the police report was leaked to the media, which led to the Jackson incident coming to light. Ramsey wanted polygraph tests to find out who released the report. He since has relented from the demand.
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jul 10th, 2003 at 11:26am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
mrsb,

If you have the e-mail addresses of any city employees, you could send them a message through an anonymous remailer. This would protect you from being "marked." You'll find a web-based secure, anonymous remailer here:

https://riot.EU.org/anon/remailer.html.en

An alternate technique would be to create a free, anonymous e-mail account with ZipLip. Unlike most email services, ZipLip does not include your IP address in e-mail messages.
Posted by: mrsb
Posted on: Jul 10th, 2003 at 10:36am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Dear George,

I am very much in a position to inform city hall employees of this website.  But to keep from being marked here in "Mayberry II," I will only contact one and then let that person *network*.  As a matter of fact, I've been trying to contact that particular person since before I even posted the first time.

Yes, this is an outrage!  It's an outrage that Ramsey's top priority is to discipline a truth-telling-whistleblower rather than to make sure his police department is following departmental procedures and policies so that there is no need for whistleblowing! Wink
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jul 10th, 2003 at 9:41am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
mrsb,

As I recall, Russ Fine mentioned to me that he was amazed to learn that the federal whistleblower protection law offers no protection to the person who disclosed the police report (which is a public record that Irondale had improperly, and perhaps illegally, refused to release).

The polygraph witch hunt Ramsey had ordered -- to find a whistleblower who broke no law -- is indeed an outrage. The city council's public safety committee, which has taken over the hunt for the whistleblower, may yet order polygraph testing. If you are in a position to inform any city hall employees about this website, I hope you'll mention it to them. Anyone ordered to submit to a polygraph interrogation would benefit from reading The Lie Behind the Lie Detector first.
Posted by: mrsb
Posted on: Jul 10th, 2003 at 9:29am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
If y'all only lived here in Irondale, Alabama to see this mess for yourself!  First of all, it's odd how a mayor's city that is so far in debt WAS willing to spend $200 per test per employee just to railroad a whistle blower after laying off over 30 city employees last year.  Second, can you imagine how the federal government would come down on Mr. A. Allen Ramsey if he did take disciplinary action on a whistle blower?

And I'd just like to say for the record that Mr. Ramsey thinks HE is the city, and not the employees and citizens of Irondale.  If there were no such thing as "power," then Mr. Ramsey would have no interest in the position of mayor whatsoever! Roll Eyes (Ooops!  Did I say that?Lips Sealed) Grin
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jul 10th, 2003 at 7:04am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
More news regarding the Irondale scandal is available here:

http://www.postherald.com/me070903.shtml

Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jul 10th, 2003 at 7:00am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Suethem,

Note that even polygraphers who don't administer pre-employment polygraph screening examinations nonetheless rely on the probable-lie control question test (PLCQT). This discredited technique, which has no scientific basis whatsoever, is the polygrapher's stock-in-trade.
Posted by: suethem
Posted on: Jul 10th, 2003 at 4:36am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Saidme,

You've told this website that you don't believe in pre-employment polygraphs.  You said that you have never done them and you never will!   

Yet, you still are making comments about peoples complaints about their pre-employment polygraphs.   

Why?  If you admit their a waste of time, then why comment?

Its your credibility that suffers when you make mean comments to George or anyone else that has 'failed' a PLCQT, a test that you yourself have not ever given and won't.

I know that polygraphers like to have it both ways, but if the test is not worthy of your time, then commenting on it can't be either.
Posted by: orolan
Posted on: Jul 10th, 2003 at 1:23am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
suethem,
There's a good idea. Then the mayor can pick and choose who is actually guilty while excluding any friends who failed under the guise of "false positives".
Interestingly enough, things are mighty quiet up in Warren these days. I think the DA has gone "underground" with his investigation. That probably means they have a strong suspect in mind. We'll see.
Posted by: suethem
Posted on: Jul 10th, 2003 at 1:15am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
All...

Maybe the Mayor of Irondale can hire the polygrapher from the Molly Bish case....   

I wonder when the DA's office is going to charge all 11 of the suspects in the Molly Bish case who 'failed' the polygraph?

Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jul 8th, 2003 at 2:50pm
  Mark & Quote
According to an article by Birmingham News staff writer Anita Debro titled "Investigation continues into leak" (8 July), the Irondale city government has not entirely abandoned the idea of resorting to polygraph interrogations to find the whistleblower who provided the police report to Russ & Dee Fine:

Quote:
Irondale's Public Safety Committee, charged with handling the internal investigation into who leaked information about the drug investigation, has yet to interview any employees or ask any to take a polygraph test as Irondale Mayor Allen Ramsey had suggested.

Ramsey requested last week that City Hall employees be interviewed and given a polygraph test if necessary to find out who gave a police report about the drug investigation to radio talk show hosts Russ and Dee Fine.

City Attorney Greg Morris said no polygraph tests are scheduled for the near future. He denied published reports that the committee has backed off giving the lie detector tests altogether.

"We may have to (ask for a polygraph), but we may not have to," he said. "We are just in the fact-finding stage."

Posted by: orolan
Posted on: Jul 8th, 2003 at 1:53am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
In case you didn't see it, this is from today's Birmingham Post-Herald.
Quote:
The plan for lie-detector tests demanded by Ramsey have been abandoned, said Greg Morris, Irondale city attorney.

The article centers on the son's pending sentence for two armed robbery charges unrelated to the incident involving drugs that sparked the current controversy.
http://www.postherald.com/me070703.shtml
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jul 4th, 2003 at 9:59am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
I've been in touch with Russ and Dee Fine regarding Mayor Ramsey's planned polygraph hunt for the inconvenient whistleblower.

It seems that Tarrant Police Chief Jesse Sprayberry, who is to conduct the "tests" for $200-a-pop and has already polygraphed some members of the Irondale P.D. (including acting chief Norman Stapp), is a buddy of Mayor Ramsey's. So, apart from the sheer stupidity and obvious impropriety of using an invalid test in an attempt to find and punish a whistleblower, there is also a conflict of interest involved.

Russ Fine mentioned to me that he read my letter to the Birmingham News a couple times on the air Wednesday morning. He also mentioned that Irondale is threatening to charge him and Dee with obstruction of justice!
Posted by: orolan
Posted on: Jul 3rd, 2003 at 10:35pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Politics in small-town America Roll Eyes
Posted by: guest from canada
Posted on: Jul 3rd, 2003 at 10:32pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
I can't wait to see the results from the Mayors poly.  I would laugh my A$$ off if he were labelled as deceptive. Problem is the politicians are as deceptive as the polygraphers and they would just sweep the mayors failure under the rug.
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jul 3rd, 2003 at 9:55pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Here's a more detailed article on the scandal in Irondale:

http://www.postherald.com/me070303.shtml
Posted by: orolan
Posted on: Jul 3rd, 2003 at 8:06pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
In her follow-up story, Debro writes:
Quote:
Ramsey said employees will be interviewed first by the Public Safety Committee comprised of City Attorney Greg Morris and several City Council members. If the committee deems necessary, the employee will be asked to submit to the polygraph.
Do you suppose these interviews will occur before or after Morris and the City Council members have sat for their own polygraphs?
Debro then writes:
Quote:
Ramsey said employees who refuse the polygraph will be cited for insubordination and subject to disciplinary action.

But what will happen to these two?:
Quote:
City Council members Ron Bagwell and Jack Boone said Wednesday they would not take a polygraph test.

Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jul 3rd, 2003 at 5:34pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Saidme,

If you think that anything in my letter is counterfactual, or that it should somehow be disregarded on the basis of my own polygraph experience (I was falsely accused of deception during an FBI pre-employment polygraph examination), please explain.
Posted by: Saidme
Posted on: Jul 3rd, 2003 at 5:03pm
  Mark & QuoteQuote
George

Maybe you should caveat your letters with something to the effect "I took a polygraph examination and failed.  I am a disgruntled FBI applicant."   

Maybe that would lend a little more credibility to your letters.  At least it would be factual.
Posted by: George W. Maschke
Posted on: Jul 3rd, 2003 at 11:33am
  Mark & Quote
Birmingham News staff writer Anita Debro reports that the mayor of Irondale, Alabama, has ordered polygraph "testing" at city hall in an article titled "Irondale plans lie detector tests." The following is an excerpt:

Quote:
Irondale Mayor Allen Ramsey is ordering all City Hall employees to undergo a polygraph test to determine who may have leaked confidential police information.

Ramsey said Tuesday night he will submit to the testing and he is also asking members of the Irondale City Council to do the same.

"In leaking confidential police information, those persons are guilty of impeding an active ongoing investigation," Ramsey said.

According to Ramsey, someone made allegations of misconduct in the Irondale Police Department and leaked confidential information to radio talk show hosts Russ and Dee Fine late last week.

The Jefferson County District Attorney's Office is now investigating claims of wrongdoing in the Irondale Police Department.


I've e-mailed the following letter to the editor of the Birmingham News, cc'd it to Mayor Ramsey, the members of  the Irondale city council, and other city officials, and forwarded it to radio talk show hosts Russ and Dee Fine:

Quote:
To: Birmingham News Editor <epage@bhamnews.com>
From: "George W. Maschke" <maschke@antipolygraph.org>
Subject: Polygraph Testing at City Hall
Cc: Mayor@cityofirondale.org, SimpsonBerry@cityofirondale.org, RayJackson@cityofirondale.org, SueMiles@cityofirondale.org, PeteCrye@cityofirondale.org, RonaldBagwell@cityofirondale.org, JackBoone@cityofirondale.org, MichaelMoers@cityofirondale.org, GregMorris@cityofirondale.org, gcox@cityofirondale.org, faye@cityofirondale.org, news@cityofirondale.org, Administrative_Office@12059560950.iddd.tpc.int
Bcc: 
X-Attachments: 

Dear Birmingham News Editor:

Irondale Mayor Allen Ramsey's decision to order a polygraph dragnet at city hall is a mistake (Mayor orders City Hall polygraphs to trace leaks, July 2). Too few people understand how polygraph testing actually works. The dirty little secret behind the "test" is that it actually depends on trickery, not science. The polygrapher, while admonishing the examinee to answer all questions truthfully, secretly assumes that denials in response to certain questions -- called "control" questions -- will be less than truthful.

One commonly used control question is, "Did you ever lie to get out of trouble?" The polygrapher steers the examinee into a denial by suggesting, for example, that anyone who would do so is the same kind of person who would leak confidential information and then lie about it. But secretly, it is assumed that everyone has lied to get out of trouble.

The polygrapher scores the test by comparing physiological reactions to these probable-lie control questions with reactions to relevant questions such as, "Did you leak that information?" If the former reactions are greater, the examinee passes; if the latter are greater, he fails. This simplistic methodology has no grounding in the scientific method.

Polygraph tests also include irrelevant questions like "Is today Wednesday?" The polygrapher falsely explains to the examinee that such questions provide a "baseline for truth," but in reality, they are not scored at all and merely serve as buffers between sets of relevant and control questions.

Investigators value the polygraph because naive and gullible examinees sometimes make disqualifying admissions. But many truthful persons fail the "test." Perversely, the test is biased against the truthful because the more honestly one answers the control questions, and as a consequence feels less stress when answering them, the more likely one is to fail.

Conversely, liars can beat the test by covertly augmenting their physiological reactions to the control questions. This can be done by constricting the anal sphincter muscle, biting the side of the tongue, or merely thinking exciting thoughts. Although polygraphers frequently claim they can detect such countermeasures, no polygrapher has ever demonstrated any ability to do so, and peer-reviewed research indicates that they can't. More detailed information on polygraph countermeasures is freely available on the Internet at www.antipolygraph.org.

George W. Maschke
AntiPolygraph.org


Irondale mayor Allen Ramsey's polygraph decree speaks to the need for passage of a Comprehensive Employee Polygraph Protection Act that would extend to public employees and applicants the same workplace protections against the pseudoscience of polygraphy that other Americans have enjoyed since 1988.
 
  Top