Add Poll
 
Options: Text Color Split Pie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X
Topic Summary - Displaying 3 post(s).
Posted by: Seeker
Posted on: Mar 11th, 2003 at 3:35am
  Mark & Quote
Skeptic wrote on Mar 10th, 2003 at 8:21am:

Polygraphing an unwilling person is even frowned upon by most polygraphers, from what I've seen.  What if he refuses to talk in the first place?

Of course, as the New York Times reported yesterday, the main point is to break people down; perhaps the polygraph is being suggested as a way to help do so (don't get me started on the other techniques we're evidently using right now -- if the NYT article is accurate, the interrogation of the prisoners we're holding is a shameful departure from the values this country supposedly upholds).

Skeptic


Skeptic:

If the polygraph is being used as a way to break Khalid Mohammed down, it futher goes to my point of how utterly ridiculous such a suggestion is!

You would think that Khalid Mohammed would welcome such silliness since he most certainly is aware of his own organization's training manual that dispells all of the myths behind the polygraph.

Simply stupid thinking on the part of law enforcement/intelligence agencies!

Regards,
Posted by: Skeptic
Posted on: Mar 10th, 2003 at 8:21am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
Polygraphing an unwilling person is even frowned upon by most polygraphers, from what I've seen.  What if he refuses to talk in the first place?

Of course, as the New York Times reported yesterday, the main point is to break people down; perhaps the polygraph is being suggested as a way to help do so (don't get me started on the other techniques we're evidently using right now -- if the NYT article is accurate, the interrogation of the prisoners we're holding is a shameful departure from the values this country supposedly upholds).

Skeptic
Posted by: Seeker
Posted on: Mar 10th, 2003 at 4:21am
  Mark & QuoteQuote
http://www.nydailynews.com/03-05-2003/news/story/64475p-60092c.html

Oh, this is absolutely insane!

I find it incredibly stupid to suggest that someone of Middle Eastern/Islamic background be polygraphed, but utterly insane to suggest that Khalid Mohammed be hooked up to this toy!!

With absolute knowledge of the existance of the Al-Qaeda training manual, it is most certain that a top leutenant such as Khalid Mohammed would not only be aware of the section on effective countermeasures against the polygraph machine, but would by all means be very well versed in them.

Once again the law enforcement/intelligence community showcases their total ineptitude and foolish arrogance.

Still shaking my head over this one.......

Seeker
 
  Top