AntiPolygraph.org Message Board

Topic Summary - Displaying 4 post(s).

Posted by: beech trees
Posted on: Sep 25^th, 2002 at 3:46pm

Mark & Quote

Quote

Whisper wrote on Sep 24^th, 2002 at 10:45pm:

I should add the reason I ask for this info is to respond to a letter in the editorials of a local paper. The writer repsonded to a previous article that said "there is no independent, repeatable, verifiable scientific evidence supporting polygraphy." The writer said this was blatantly untrue and calls our attention to the in-depth study the Louisiana State Supreme Court did of the polygraph in 1979, outlined in the case of State vs Catanese. The writer continued by saying that is was admissible in the New Jersey courts if the prosecutors agreed to it.

Is that letter to the editor online somewhere? I'd like to read it. The argument is fairly worthless and inaccurate, IMHO.

Posted by: beech trees
Posted on: Sep 25^th, 2002 at 12:57am

Mark & Quote

While several Google searches elicited hits on 'state v. catanese', they were all brief citations for precedent dealing with later court decisions.

The Louisiana State Supreme Court website only has opinions dating back to 1995 or so. I called the Clerk and found out that the full text can be copied and mailed to you for a fee, or you can stop by the Clerk's office and read it there (presuming you're in LA).

A good law library in your area also might have the decision on file, or perhaps a good samaritan here on the boards can get it to you (I'd be interested in reading it as well).

Curiously, it would appear that State v. Catanese DID exclude polygraph evidence during the course of the trial, finding in part:

...the probative value [of the polygraph] is so outweighed by reasons for its exclusion that the evidence should not be admitted in criminal trials...

An excellent commentary on both the Frye decision and its successor, Daubert, may be read here. One of the pertinent passages concerning Catanese is as follows:

Quote:

Similarly, in State v. Catanese,(33) the Louisiana Supreme Court relied on Professor McCormick's criticism of Frye in concluding that the "`general acceptance' standard of Frye is an unjustifiable obstacle to the admission of polygraph test results."(34) Even though the Catanese court was influenced by criticism of the Frye standard, it nevertheless excluded the polygraph evidence, reasoning that the "probative value is so outweighed by reasons for its exclusion that the evidence should not be admitted in criminal trials."(35) Thus, the reaction of several state courts to the growing criticism of Frye was evident years before the United States Supreme Court overruled the Frye standard in its Daubert decision.(36)

Dave

Posted by: Whisper
Posted on: Sep 24^th, 2002 at 10:45pm

Mark & Quote

Quote

Posted by: Whisper Posted on: Sep 24^th, 2002 at 10:04pm	Mark & Quote Quote
Is anyone familiar with this case? Did/does it allow for polygraphs to be used in court? tks

Question:

Options:	Text	Color	Split Pie
Option 1:
Option 2:
Option 3:
Option 4:
Option 5:
Option 6:
Option 7:
Option 8:

Automatic End in:	days and minutes. Leave it blank if you don't want to set it now.
Enable Guest Voting:	Check this if you want guests to be able to vote in this poll.
Hide results:	Check this if you do not want the results of this poll shown until voting has been closed.
Multiple Choice	Check this if you want to allow users to vote for more than one option.
Time limit for deleting vote:	Time in minutes users are allowed to delete their vote (0 to disable delete).
Use legends for Pie Chart	Check this to use legends instead of labels next to each pie slice.
Pie Chart Radius:	Must be a value between 100 and 200 (default 100)

Name:
E-mail:
Your Verification Code is:	Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Verification Code:
Preview