{"id":714,"date":"2012-08-09T10:18:29","date_gmt":"2012-08-09T15:18:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/?p=714"},"modified":"2026-05-17T05:14:31","modified_gmt":"2026-05-17T10:14:31","slug":"dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2012\/08\/09\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\/","title":{"rendered":"DEA Contractor Sued for Violation of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\"\"<\/a>San Diego City Beat<\/em> staff writer David Maass<\/a> reports<\/a> on the case of 10 translators formerly employed by Metropolitan Interpreters and Translators<\/a>, a company that provides services to the Drug Enforcement Agency among other federal agencies. The translators were terminated for either failing, having inconclusive results on, or refusing to submit to, polygraph interrogations conducted by DEA polygraph operators. In a federal lawsuit, attorneys for\u00a0the translators allege<\/a>\u00a0(convincingly, in AntiPolygraph.org’s view), that Metropolitan violated the Employee Polygraph Protection Act, which severely restricts the use of polygraphs by private companies. The DEA itself and individual DEA employees may eventually be added to the list of defendants in this case.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

San Diego City Beat staff writer David Maass reports on the case of 10 translators formerly employed by Metropolitan Interpreters and Translators, a company that provides services to the Drug Enforcement Agency among other federal agencies. The translators were terminated for either failing, having inconclusive results on, or refusing to submit to, polygraph interrogations conducted …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[154,155,71,156],"class_list":["post-714","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-polygraph","tag-dea","tag-drug-enforcement-agency","tag-employee-polygraph-protection-act","tag-eppa","anons"],"yoast_head":"\nDEA Contractor Sued for Violation of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act - AntiPolygraph.org News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2012\/08\/09\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"DEA Contractor Sued for Violation of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act - AntiPolygraph.org News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"San Diego City Beat staff writer David Maass reports on the case of 10 translators formerly employed by Metropolitan Interpreters and Translators, a company that provides services to the Drug Enforcement Agency among other federal agencies. The translators were terminated for either failing, having inconclusive results on, or refusing to submit to, polygraph interrogations conducted ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2012\/08\/09\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"AntiPolygraph.org News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/AntiPolygraph.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-08-09T15:18:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-17T10:14:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/08\/dea-seal.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"AntiPolygraph.org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ap_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ap_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"AntiPolygraph.org\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2012\\\/08\\\/09\\\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2012\\\/08\\\/09\\\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"AntiPolygraph.org\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/369226985d60d0cd81bc388f32f13fc0\"},\"headline\":\"DEA Contractor Sued for Violation of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act\",\"datePublished\":\"2012-08-09T15:18:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-17T10:14:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2012\\\/08\\\/09\\\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":121,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2012\\\/08\\\/09\\\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2012\\\/08\\\/dea-seal-150x150.png\",\"keywords\":[\"DEA\",\"Drug Enforcement Agency\",\"Employee Polygraph Protection Act\",\"EPPA\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Polygraph\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2012\\\/08\\\/09\\\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2012\\\/08\\\/09\\\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2012\\\/08\\\/09\\\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\\\/\",\"name\":\"DEA Contractor Sued for Violation of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act - AntiPolygraph.org News\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2012\\\/08\\\/09\\\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2012\\\/08\\\/09\\\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2012\\\/08\\\/dea-seal-150x150.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2012-08-09T15:18:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-17T10:14:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2012\\\/08\\\/09\\\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2012\\\/08\\\/09\\\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2012\\\/08\\\/09\\\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2012\\\/08\\\/dea-seal.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2012\\\/08\\\/dea-seal.png\",\"width\":\"600\",\"height\":\"600\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2012\\\/08\\\/09\\\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"DEA Contractor Sued for Violation of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"AntiPolygraph.org News\",\"description\":\"Original reporting and commentary about polygraphs, voice stress analyzers, and other purported "lie detectors."\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"AntiPolygraph.org\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/polygraph-quackery.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/polygraph-quackery.jpg\",\"width\":1355,\"height\":799,\"caption\":\"AntiPolygraph.org\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/AntiPolygraph.org\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/ap_org\",\"https:\\\/\\\/bsky.app\\\/profile\\\/antipolygraph.bsky.social\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/user\\\/AntiPolygraph\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/369226985d60d0cd81bc388f32f13fc0\",\"name\":\"AntiPolygraph.org\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/352648b7de416838c71aefdde2aafa386ca68af8d96ef52138d397773bfbeff1?s=96&d=mm&r=x\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/352648b7de416838c71aefdde2aafa386ca68af8d96ef52138d397773bfbeff1?s=96&d=mm&r=x\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/352648b7de416838c71aefdde2aafa386ca68af8d96ef52138d397773bfbeff1?s=96&d=mm&r=x\",\"caption\":\"AntiPolygraph.org\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/author\\\/antipolygraph-org-administrator\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"DEA Contractor Sued for Violation of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act - AntiPolygraph.org News","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2012\/08\/09\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"DEA Contractor Sued for Violation of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act - AntiPolygraph.org News","og_description":"San Diego City Beat staff writer David Maass reports on the case of 10 translators formerly employed by Metropolitan Interpreters and Translators, a company that provides services to the Drug Enforcement Agency among other federal agencies. The translators were terminated for either failing, having inconclusive results on, or refusing to submit to, polygraph interrogations conducted ...","og_url":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2012\/08\/09\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\/","og_site_name":"AntiPolygraph.org News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/AntiPolygraph.org","article_published_time":"2012-08-09T15:18:29+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-05-17T10:14:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":600,"height":600,"url":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/08\/dea-seal.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"AntiPolygraph.org","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ap_org","twitter_site":"@ap_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"AntiPolygraph.org","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2012\/08\/09\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2012\/08\/09\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\/"},"author":{"name":"AntiPolygraph.org","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/369226985d60d0cd81bc388f32f13fc0"},"headline":"DEA Contractor Sued for Violation of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act","datePublished":"2012-08-09T15:18:29+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-17T10:14:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2012\/08\/09\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\/"},"wordCount":121,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2012\/08\/09\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/08\/dea-seal-150x150.png","keywords":["DEA","Drug Enforcement Agency","Employee Polygraph Protection Act","EPPA"],"articleSection":["Polygraph"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2012\/08\/09\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2012\/08\/09\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\/","url":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2012\/08\/09\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\/","name":"DEA Contractor Sued for Violation of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act - AntiPolygraph.org News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2012\/08\/09\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2012\/08\/09\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/08\/dea-seal-150x150.png","datePublished":"2012-08-09T15:18:29+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-17T10:14:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2012\/08\/09\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2012\/08\/09\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2012\/08\/09\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/08\/dea-seal.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/08\/dea-seal.png","width":"600","height":"600"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2012\/08\/09\/dea-contractor-sued-for-violation-of-the-employee-polygraph-protection-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"DEA Contractor Sued for Violation of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/","name":"AntiPolygraph.org News","description":"Original reporting and commentary about polygraphs, voice stress analyzers, and other purported "lie detectors."","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#organization","name":"AntiPolygraph.org","url":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/polygraph-quackery.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/polygraph-quackery.jpg","width":1355,"height":799,"caption":"AntiPolygraph.org"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/AntiPolygraph.org","https:\/\/x.com\/ap_org","https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/antipolygraph.bsky.social","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/AntiPolygraph"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/369226985d60d0cd81bc388f32f13fc0","name":"AntiPolygraph.org","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/352648b7de416838c71aefdde2aafa386ca68af8d96ef52138d397773bfbeff1?s=96&d=mm&r=x","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/352648b7de416838c71aefdde2aafa386ca68af8d96ef52138d397773bfbeff1?s=96&d=mm&r=x","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/352648b7de416838c71aefdde2aafa386ca68af8d96ef52138d397773bfbeff1?s=96&d=mm&r=x","caption":"AntiPolygraph.org"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog"],"url":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/author\/antipolygraph-org-administrator\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/714","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=714"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/714\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6480,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/714\/revisions\/6480"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=714"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=714"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=714"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}