{"id":526,"date":"2010-12-24T03:26:01","date_gmt":"2010-12-24T07:26:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/?p=526"},"modified":"2026-05-19T11:37:45","modified_gmt":"2026-05-19T16:37:45","slug":"congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2010\/12\/24\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\/","title":{"rendered":"Congress Expands Customs and Border Protection Polygraph Screening"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"entry\">\n<p>Brian Kalish <a title=\"Congress passes legislation requiring polygraphs for CBP agents\" href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20110429095717\/http:\/\/www.govexec.com\/dailyfed\/1210\/122210BK1.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">reports<\/a> for GovernmentExecutive.com on the House of Representatives&#8217; unanimous passage of the <a title=\"Anti-Border Corruption Act of 2010\" href=\"https:\/\/www.govinfo.gov\/content\/pkg\/BILLS-111s3243enr\/pdf\/BILLS-111s3243enr.pdf\">Anti-Border Corruption Act of 2010<\/a> (PDF) mandating that within two years, &#8220;all applicants for law enforcement positions with U.S. Customs and Border Protection receive polygraph examinations before being hired for such a position.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Currently, only 15% of CBP applicants are polygraphed, with a reported\u00a0<a title=\"Customs and Border Protection Polygraph Failure Rate Pegged at 60%\" href=\"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2010\/12\/24\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\/\">failure rate of 60%<\/a>. However, a reader <a title=\"Reader Comments on Congress passes legislation requiring polygraphs for CBP agents\" href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20110429095721\/http:\/\/www.govexec.com\/mailbagDetails.cfm?aid=46774\">comment<\/a> on GovernmentExecutive.com suggests a significantly higher failure rate (emphasis added):<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">CBP needs to be more proactive in our search for the most qualified and upstanding candidates for employment to these sensitive positions. Our agency needs the very best citizens to serve the public in protecting our country from illegal entries of persons, goods and transports.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>Only 1 in 341 applicants for Border Patrol Agent passed the polygraph test during our last recruitment.<\/strong> That is a very sad commentary, and bears a very poor reflection on our society in general.<\/p>\n<p>AntiPolygraph.org cannot confirm the accuracy of this claim, and we welcome confirmation or disconfirmation from those with knowledge of the facts. Contact information is available <a title=\"Contact AntiPolygraph.org\" href=\"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/contact.shtml\">here<\/a>, and anonymous contact is also welcomed.<\/p>\n<p>It is not clear whether periodic polygraph screening might eventually become a requirement for existing CBP employees. While the law does not mandate it, neither does it prohibit it.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Brian Kalish reports for GovernmentExecutive.com on the House of Representatives&#8217; unanimous passage of the Anti-Border Corruption Act of 2010 (PDF) mandating that within two years, &#8220;all applicants for law enforcement positions with U.S. Customs and Border Protection receive polygraph examinations before being hired for such a position.&#8221; Currently, only 15% of CBP applicants are polygraphed, &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[127,88,70],"class_list":["post-526","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-polygraph","tag-cbp","tag-customs-and-border-protection","tag-polygraph-screening","anons"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Congress Expands Customs and Border Protection Polygraph Screening - AntiPolygraph.org News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2010\/12\/24\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Congress Expands Customs and Border Protection Polygraph Screening - AntiPolygraph.org News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Brian Kalish reports for GovernmentExecutive.com on the House of Representatives&#8217; unanimous passage of the Anti-Border Corruption Act of 2010 (PDF) mandating that within two years, &#8220;all applicants for law enforcement positions with U.S. Customs and Border Protection receive polygraph examinations before being hired for such a position.&#8221; Currently, only 15% of CBP applicants are polygraphed, ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2010\/12\/24\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"AntiPolygraph.org News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/AntiPolygraph.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-12-24T07:26:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-19T16:37:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"AntiPolygraph.org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ap_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ap_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"AntiPolygraph.org\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2010\\\/12\\\/24\\\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2010\\\/12\\\/24\\\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"AntiPolygraph.org\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/369226985d60d0cd81bc388f32f13fc0\"},\"headline\":\"Congress Expands Customs and Border Protection Polygraph Screening\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-24T07:26:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-19T16:37:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2010\\\/12\\\/24\\\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":223,\"commentCount\":2,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"CBP\",\"Customs and Border Protection\",\"polygraph screening\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Polygraph\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2010\\\/12\\\/24\\\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2010\\\/12\\\/24\\\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2010\\\/12\\\/24\\\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\\\/\",\"name\":\"Congress Expands Customs and Border Protection Polygraph Screening - AntiPolygraph.org News\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-24T07:26:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-19T16:37:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2010\\\/12\\\/24\\\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2010\\\/12\\\/24\\\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2010\\\/12\\\/24\\\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Congress Expands Customs and Border Protection Polygraph Screening\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"AntiPolygraph.org News\",\"description\":\"Original reporting and commentary about polygraphs, voice stress analyzers, and other purported &quot;lie detectors.&quot;\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"AntiPolygraph.org\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/polygraph-quackery.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/polygraph-quackery.jpg\",\"width\":1355,\"height\":799,\"caption\":\"AntiPolygraph.org\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/AntiPolygraph.org\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/ap_org\",\"https:\\\/\\\/bsky.app\\\/profile\\\/antipolygraph.bsky.social\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/user\\\/AntiPolygraph\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/369226985d60d0cd81bc388f32f13fc0\",\"name\":\"AntiPolygraph.org\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/352648b7de416838c71aefdde2aafa386ca68af8d96ef52138d397773bfbeff1?s=96&d=mm&r=x\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/352648b7de416838c71aefdde2aafa386ca68af8d96ef52138d397773bfbeff1?s=96&d=mm&r=x\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/352648b7de416838c71aefdde2aafa386ca68af8d96ef52138d397773bfbeff1?s=96&d=mm&r=x\",\"caption\":\"AntiPolygraph.org\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/author\\\/antipolygraph-org-administrator\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Congress Expands Customs and Border Protection Polygraph Screening - AntiPolygraph.org News","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2010\/12\/24\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Congress Expands Customs and Border Protection Polygraph Screening - AntiPolygraph.org News","og_description":"Brian Kalish reports for GovernmentExecutive.com on the House of Representatives&#8217; unanimous passage of the Anti-Border Corruption Act of 2010 (PDF) mandating that within two years, &#8220;all applicants for law enforcement positions with U.S. Customs and Border Protection receive polygraph examinations before being hired for such a position.&#8221; Currently, only 15% of CBP applicants are polygraphed, ...","og_url":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2010\/12\/24\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\/","og_site_name":"AntiPolygraph.org News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/AntiPolygraph.org","article_published_time":"2010-12-24T07:26:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-05-19T16:37:45+00:00","author":"AntiPolygraph.org","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ap_org","twitter_site":"@ap_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"AntiPolygraph.org","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2010\/12\/24\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2010\/12\/24\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\/"},"author":{"name":"AntiPolygraph.org","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/369226985d60d0cd81bc388f32f13fc0"},"headline":"Congress Expands Customs and Border Protection Polygraph Screening","datePublished":"2010-12-24T07:26:01+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-19T16:37:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2010\/12\/24\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\/"},"wordCount":223,"commentCount":2,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["CBP","Customs and Border Protection","polygraph screening"],"articleSection":["Polygraph"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2010\/12\/24\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2010\/12\/24\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\/","url":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2010\/12\/24\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\/","name":"Congress Expands Customs and Border Protection Polygraph Screening - AntiPolygraph.org News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-12-24T07:26:01+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-19T16:37:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2010\/12\/24\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2010\/12\/24\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2010\/12\/24\/congress-expands-customs-and-border-protection-polygraph-screening\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Congress Expands Customs and Border Protection Polygraph Screening"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/","name":"AntiPolygraph.org News","description":"Original reporting and commentary about polygraphs, voice stress analyzers, and other purported &quot;lie detectors.&quot;","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#organization","name":"AntiPolygraph.org","url":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/polygraph-quackery.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/polygraph-quackery.jpg","width":1355,"height":799,"caption":"AntiPolygraph.org"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/AntiPolygraph.org","https:\/\/x.com\/ap_org","https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/antipolygraph.bsky.social","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/AntiPolygraph"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/369226985d60d0cd81bc388f32f13fc0","name":"AntiPolygraph.org","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/352648b7de416838c71aefdde2aafa386ca68af8d96ef52138d397773bfbeff1?s=96&d=mm&r=x","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/352648b7de416838c71aefdde2aafa386ca68af8d96ef52138d397773bfbeff1?s=96&d=mm&r=x","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/352648b7de416838c71aefdde2aafa386ca68af8d96ef52138d397773bfbeff1?s=96&d=mm&r=x","caption":"AntiPolygraph.org"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog"],"url":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/author\/antipolygraph-org-administrator\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/526","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=526"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/526\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6808,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/526\/revisions\/6808"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=526"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=526"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=526"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}