{"id":5041,"date":"2025-04-13T03:24:49","date_gmt":"2025-04-13T08:24:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/?p=5041"},"modified":"2025-04-13T03:25:52","modified_gmt":"2025-04-13T08:25:52","slug":"about-50-dhs-employees-polygraphed-in-recent-weeks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2025\/04\/13\/about-50-dhs-employees-polygraphed-in-recent-weeks\/","title":{"rendered":"About 50 DHS Employees Polygraphed in Recent Weeks"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\n\n

Gabe Cohen reports for CNN in a 12 April 2025 article titled, “Dozens of DHS staffers, including top FEMA officials, given lie detector tests over alleged leaks.”<\/a> Excerpt:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The Department of Homeland Security has administered lie detector tests to about 50 staffers in recent weeks, including FEMA\u2019s acting administrator and roughly a dozen officials at the disaster relief agency, as part of an intensifying effort to root out what the department alleges are leaks of national security information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Acting FEMA Administrator Cameron Hamilton, an appointee of President Donald Trump, was given a polygraph just days after taking part in a meeting with top DHS officials for a policy discussion on the future of FEMA and how to potentially dismantle the agency in the coming months. That closed-door meeting was reported by CNN and other media outlets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At least one FEMA official has been placed on administrative leave and was escorted out of the agency\u2019s office this week after being administered a polygraph test, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe are agnostic about your standing, tenure, political appointment, or status as a career civil servant \u2014 we will track down leakers and prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law,\u201d DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in an email to CNN.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The investigations at DHS have raised concerns that the lie detector tests may be used on federal workers accused of leaking non-classified information to the media, particularly at FEMA where sources say classified information is handled in very limited circumstances. Whistleblower support organizations tell CNN it would be unusual, alarming and potentially illegal for the tests to be used in such cases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One FEMA official, who declined to be identified out of fear of retribution, said: \u201cThey\u2019re going after rank-and-file employees and instilling this culture of fear.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Trump administration, including at DHS and the Department of Defense, has launched various investigations involving polygraphs into unauthorized disclosures of classified and national security information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some FEMA officials \u201cfailed\u201d the test, McLaughlin said, declining to provide details on what information was allegedly leaked. She insisted DHS is following the law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe will take appropriate action and, in some cases, refer some for criminal prosecution based on additional evidence found,\u201d McLaughlin said in an email to CNN.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

McLaughlin said Hamilton\u2019s polygraph cleared him. Hamilton remains in his job. CNN has reached out to him for comment. Politico first reported he was administered the test.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The FEMA official told CNN that the idea DHS is only testing workers accused of leaking classified information is \u201cextremely farcical\u201d based on knowing some of the people who were given the tests and the positions they hold.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThey are just covering up the unpopular stuff they\u2019re doing,\u201d the official said. \u201cFEMA is a consumer of classified information, not a producer of classified information, and the FEMA programs that are truly classified are all an extremely small group of people.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A second FEMA official called the tests \u201ca witch hunt.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI find it very, very hard to believe that within the normal course of business, any of these employees had their hands on classified material,\u201d the official said. \u201cThey are trying to incite fear. They are trying to get rid of people.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Read the rest of the article here<\/a>. To AntiPolygraph.org’s knowledge, there is no instance of polygraph screening ever solving a federal leak investigation, and Gabe Cohen’s reporting here does not allege that the FEMA employee placed on administrative leave and escorted out of the office was the source of any leaked information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AntiPolygraph.org welcomes comment on this topic, especially those with first hand knowledge. If you don’t feel comfortable posting a public comment on this blog, you are welcome to contact us anonymously and securely via Signal Private messenger at ap_org.01<\/a> or via Simplex Chat here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Gabe Cohen reports for CNN in a 12 April 2025 article titled, “Dozens of DHS staffers, including top FEMA officials, given lie detector tests over alleged leaks.” Excerpt: The Department of Homeland Security has administered lie detector tests to about 50 staffers in recent weeks, including FEMA\u2019s acting administrator and roughly a dozen officials at …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[215,620,143,70],"class_list":{"0":"post-5041","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-polygraph","7":"tag-dhs","8":"tag-fema","9":"tag-leaks","10":"tag-polygraph-screening","11":"anons"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5041","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5041"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5041\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5043,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5041\/revisions\/5043"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5041"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5041"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5041"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}