{"id":4245,"date":"2004-12-01T15:00:48","date_gmt":"2004-12-01T20:00:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/?p=4245"},"modified":"2021-03-22T13:13:28","modified_gmt":"2021-03-22T18:13:28","slug":"special-forces-reportedly-using-cvsa-in-iraq-afghanistan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2004\/12\/01\/special-forces-reportedly-using-cvsa-in-iraq-afghanistan\/","title":{"rendered":"Special Forces Reportedly Using CVSA in Iraq, Afghanistan"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\n\n

A report about Computer Voice Stress Analysis (CVSA) on the website of Central Ohio television station WBNS (“Tool Catches Fibbing Suspects”<\/a>) concludes by mentioning that the Special Forces are using CVSA to interrogate suspected terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan. The entire report is reproduced here: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

More and more police departments in Ohio are turning to technology used in war zones to question suspected terrorists and to determine if someone is telling the truth.<\/p>

Critics call it “junk science,” but a central Ohio detective swears it turns suspects into confessors.<\/p>

When Detective Dave King walks into an interrogation room, he brings a secret weapon. It’s a computer that measures stress in a person’s voice.<\/p>

Detective King says the computer never lies. “These computers are now used in more than 140 Ohio police departments. At $10,000 a piece, they are actually a cost saver to departments that can’t afford a full time polygraph unit,” says King.<\/p>

Critics say the voice stress computer is junk science and officers are using trickery to gain confessions.<\/p>

10-TV Reporter Kevin Landers put the computer to a test.<\/p>

Detective King hooked a microphone to him, and answered two questions. One question he answered truthfully and one with a lie. King says the results from the machine tell him when Kevin is lying.<\/p>

King says, “There have been times when people come in and I totally bought their story.”<\/p>

Then he turns the machine on.<\/p>

“Had it not been for CVSA, I, and other investigators, would have believed what they told us and they would have gotten away with it,” says King.<\/p>

Voice stress analyzers are also in use in Iraq and Afghanistan. Special Forces units use them to interrogate suspected terrorists.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The critics who call CVSA junk science are supported by the National Institute of Truth Verification<\/a> (the company that peddles CVSA) itself, which has reportedly acknowledged in a court filing<\/a> that CVSA “is not capable of lie detection.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That the U.S. Government is relying on the junk science of voice stress analysis to interrogate suspected terrorists is corroborated by the testimony of a former Guantanamo detainee. See the AntiPolygraph.org discussion thread, Polygraph & Voice Stress Test Relied on at Gitmo<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A report about Computer Voice Stress Analysis (CVSA) on the website of Central Ohio television station WBNS (“Tool Catches Fibbing Suspects”) concludes by mentioning that the Special Forces are using CVSA to interrogate suspected terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan. The entire report is reproduced here: More and more police departments in Ohio are turning to …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[108,252,10,113,33,224,94,253],"class_list":{"0":"post-4245","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-polygraph","7":"tag-afghanistan","8":"tag-army","9":"tag-cvsa","10":"tag-dod","11":"tag-iraq","12":"tag-nitv","13":"tag-ohio","14":"tag-special-forces","15":"anons"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4245","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4245"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4245\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4246,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4245\/revisions\/4246"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4245"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4245"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4245"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}