{"id":4130,"date":"2004-01-17T15:00:55","date_gmt":"2004-01-17T20:00:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/?p=4130"},"modified":"2021-03-20T07:36:10","modified_gmt":"2021-03-20T12:36:10","slug":"rule-on-marijuana-sparks-rift-for-police","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2004\/01\/17\/rule-on-marijuana-sparks-rift-for-police\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;Rule on Marijuana Sparks Rift for Police&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"entry\">\n\n\n<p>This <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20040213194734\/http:\/\/www.abqtrib.com\/archives\/news04\/011704_news_pot.shtml\">article<\/a> by <em>Albuquerque Tribune<\/em> correspondent Aubrey Hovey includes a discussion of the Albuquerque Police Department&#8217;s policy of polygraphing applicants in an attempt to ascertain their truthfulness with regard to past drug use. Excerpt: <\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>A marijuana-induced &#8220;buzz&#8221; is floating around the Albuquerque Police Department.<\/p><p>Past drug use by potential police recruits has caused a rift between Professional Standards Division Captain Ron Paiz and Jeff Remington, the police union president.<\/p><p>Paiz proposed changing a policy which disqualifies police recruits if they have smoked marijuana in the last three years. He wants to reduce the number of years from three to two.<\/p><p>Paiz, who proposed the change to APD Chief Gil Gallegos in October, called the old policy &#8220;outdated.&#8221; He said the department should mirror other law enforcement agencies around the state that accept recruits under the two-year policy.<\/p><p>Gallegos is reviewing the proposal, Paiz said.<\/p><p>Remington disagrees with the change, saying the new policy would lower the department&#8217;s standards. He said the only reason for the change would be to attract more recruits &#8211; the wrong kind.<\/p><p>&#8220;Why lower the standards unless you&#8217;re trying to attract a group of people that you can&#8217;t recruit unless you lower the standards?&#8221; Remington said Friday.<\/p><p>Paiz insists the department&#8217;s ongoing recruitment efforts have nothing to do with the proposal.<\/p><p>&#8220;That&#8217;s not the intent of the policy change,&#8221; Paiz said. &#8220;The change is to come in line with the times.&#8221;<\/p><p>However, the Bernalillo County Sheriff&#8217;s Department, the New Mexico State Police Department and the Rio Rancho Department of Public Safety disqualify any applicant who has smoked marijuana within the last three years, department officials said.<\/p><p>Paiz said the department&#8217;s policy 30 years ago said recruits who had ever smoked marijuana would be disqualified.<\/p><p>When Paiz entered the department about 20 years ago, he said, the policy changed from ever smoking the drug to having smoked it within the past 18 months.<\/p><p>That remained in effect for 12 years, he said, before a lieutenant&#8217;s efforts led to the policy now in place.<\/p><p>Recruits are required to take a polygraph test while answering the question of how long it has been since they last smoked marijuana, Paiz said.<\/p><p>A former Sandia National Laboratories scientist said using the polygraph to screen employees is a bad idea.<\/p><p>Alan Zelicoff, a former senior scientist in the center for national security and arms control, said he has researched the polygraph and its purpose since 1995.<\/p><p>&#8220;In the setting of screening a candidate for employment, the polygraph has no place,&#8221; said Zelicoff, now a private consultant.<\/p><p>Zelicoff&#8217;s research, in conjunction with the National Academy of Sciences, shows polygraphs reject the testimony of those telling the truth instead of identifying liars.<\/p><p>He said APD is making a mistake by using the test as a drug-screening tool.<\/p><p>&#8220;They&#8217;re deceiving themselves,&#8221; he said. &#8220;If we had medical tests that had the same failure rate as a polygraph, then physicians that use those tests would be convicted of malpractice.&#8221;<\/p><p>In discussions with Gallegos about the proposal, Remington said, union representatives will stress safety and upholding high standards.<\/p><p>&#8220;We&#8217;re going to sit down and we&#8217;re going to talk about this, and . . . hopefully we&#8217;ll get the numbers up in the department,&#8221; Remington said. &#8220;Both sides want to see not only Albuquerque safer with more police patrolling, but you want to have officers taking dangerous calls with the proper back up that they need.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This article by Albuquerque Tribune correspondent Aubrey Hovey includes a discussion of the Albuquerque Police Department&#8217;s policy of polygraphing applicants in an attempt to ascertain their truthfulness with regard to past drug use. Excerpt: A marijuana-induced &#8220;buzz&#8221; is floating around the Albuquerque Police Department. Past drug use by potential police recruits has caused a rift &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[501,327],"class_list":{"0":"post-4130","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-polygraph","7":"tag-albuquerque-police-department","8":"tag-new-mexico","9":"anons"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4130","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4130"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4130\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4131,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4130\/revisions\/4131"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4130"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4130"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4130"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}