{"id":3963,"date":"2003-06-09T15:00:31","date_gmt":"2003-06-09T20:00:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/?p=3963"},"modified":"2021-03-09T13:43:12","modified_gmt":"2021-03-09T18:43:12","slug":"australia-lie-detector-test-on-trial","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2003\/06\/09\/australia-lie-detector-test-on-trial\/","title":{"rendered":"Australia: &#8220;Lie Detector Test on Trial&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"entry\">\n\n\n<p>The <em>Sunday Times<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20030714094130\/http:\/\/www.sundaytimes.news.com.au\/printpage\/0,5942,6567282,00.html\">reports<\/a> that &#8220;[the] admissibility of lie detector tests in criminal trials will be tested for the first time in a superior Australian court when an appeal against a 1994 murder conviction goes to the West Australian Supreme Court this week.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Sunday Times reports that &#8220;[the] admissibility of lie detector tests in criminal trials will be tested for the first time in a superior Australian court when an appeal against a 1994 murder conviction goes to the West Australian Supreme Court this week.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[95,121],"class_list":{"0":"post-3963","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-polygraph","7":"tag-admissibility","8":"tag-australia","9":"anons"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3963","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3963"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3963\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3964,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3963\/revisions\/3964"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3963"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3963"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3963"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}