{"id":335,"date":"2009-08-20T06:30:52","date_gmt":"2009-08-20T10:30:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/?p=335"},"modified":"2026-05-18T12:03:27","modified_gmt":"2026-05-18T17:03:27","slug":"is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2009\/08\/20\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\/","title":{"rendered":"Is Patrick T. Coffey Fit to Be Screening Police Applicants?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"entry\">\n<p>Following up on his previous article on the San Francisco Police Department&#8217;s reliance on polygraph screening&#8211;despite broad scientific consensus that it is invalid&#8211;<em>S.F. Weekly<\/em> reporter Matt Smith takes <a title=\"SFPD polygraph expert&#039;s controversial views\" href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20130129193938\/http:\/\/www.sfweekly.com\/2009-08-19\/news\/the-lie-detective\/\" target=\"_blank\">an in-depth look<\/a> at the man the SFPD has hired to polygraph applicants: Patrick T. Coffey, who received &#8220;$81,463 during the last fiscal year&#8221; for his services. Smith addresses <a title=\"Posts by Patrick T. Coffey (TheNoLieGuy4U)\" href=\"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/forum\/index.php?topic=2237.0\">bigoted postings<\/a> that Coffey made to the AntiPolygraph.org message board in 2005 under the moniker &#8220;TheNoLieGuy4U&#8221; and also reveals that Coffey paid $10,000 to settle a 2002 lawsuit by a man who alleged that Coffey &#8220;performed a voice-stress-analysis exam on him without permission.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Following up on his previous article on the San Francisco Police Department&#8217;s reliance on polygraph screening&#8211;despite broad scientific consensus that it is invalid&#8211;S.F. Weekly reporter Matt Smith takes an in-depth look at the man the SFPD has hired to polygraph applicants: Patrick T. Coffey, who received &#8220;$81,463 during the last fiscal year&#8221; for his services. &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[73,70,72],"class_list":["post-335","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-polygraph","tag-patrick-t-coffey","tag-polygraph-screening","tag-san-francisco-police-department","anons"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Is Patrick T. Coffey Fit to Be Screening Police Applicants? - AntiPolygraph.org News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2009\/08\/20\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Is Patrick T. Coffey Fit to Be Screening Police Applicants? - AntiPolygraph.org News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Following up on his previous article on the San Francisco Police Department&#8217;s reliance on polygraph screening&#8211;despite broad scientific consensus that it is invalid&#8211;S.F. Weekly reporter Matt Smith takes an in-depth look at the man the SFPD has hired to polygraph applicants: Patrick T. Coffey, who received &#8220;$81,463 during the last fiscal year&#8221; for his services. ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2009\/08\/20\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"AntiPolygraph.org News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/AntiPolygraph.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-20T10:30:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-18T17:03:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"AntiPolygraph.org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ap_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ap_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"AntiPolygraph.org\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2009\\\/08\\\/20\\\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2009\\\/08\\\/20\\\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"AntiPolygraph.org\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/369226985d60d0cd81bc388f32f13fc0\"},\"headline\":\"Is Patrick T. Coffey Fit to Be Screening Police Applicants?\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-20T10:30:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-18T17:03:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2009\\\/08\\\/20\\\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":110,\"commentCount\":1,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Patrick T. Coffey\",\"polygraph screening\",\"San Francisco Police Department\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Polygraph\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2009\\\/08\\\/20\\\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2009\\\/08\\\/20\\\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2009\\\/08\\\/20\\\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\\\/\",\"name\":\"Is Patrick T. Coffey Fit to Be Screening Police Applicants? - AntiPolygraph.org News\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-20T10:30:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-18T17:03:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2009\\\/08\\\/20\\\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2009\\\/08\\\/20\\\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/2009\\\/08\\\/20\\\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Is Patrick T. Coffey Fit to Be Screening Police Applicants?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"AntiPolygraph.org News\",\"description\":\"Original reporting and commentary about polygraphs, voice stress analyzers, and other purported &quot;lie detectors.&quot;\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"AntiPolygraph.org\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/polygraph-quackery.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/polygraph-quackery.jpg\",\"width\":1355,\"height\":799,\"caption\":\"AntiPolygraph.org\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/AntiPolygraph.org\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/ap_org\",\"https:\\\/\\\/bsky.app\\\/profile\\\/antipolygraph.bsky.social\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/user\\\/AntiPolygraph\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/369226985d60d0cd81bc388f32f13fc0\",\"name\":\"AntiPolygraph.org\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/352648b7de416838c71aefdde2aafa386ca68af8d96ef52138d397773bfbeff1?s=96&d=mm&r=x\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/352648b7de416838c71aefdde2aafa386ca68af8d96ef52138d397773bfbeff1?s=96&d=mm&r=x\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/352648b7de416838c71aefdde2aafa386ca68af8d96ef52138d397773bfbeff1?s=96&d=mm&r=x\",\"caption\":\"AntiPolygraph.org\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/antipolygraph.org\\\/blog\\\/author\\\/antipolygraph-org-administrator\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Is Patrick T. Coffey Fit to Be Screening Police Applicants? - AntiPolygraph.org News","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2009\/08\/20\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Is Patrick T. Coffey Fit to Be Screening Police Applicants? - AntiPolygraph.org News","og_description":"Following up on his previous article on the San Francisco Police Department&#8217;s reliance on polygraph screening&#8211;despite broad scientific consensus that it is invalid&#8211;S.F. Weekly reporter Matt Smith takes an in-depth look at the man the SFPD has hired to polygraph applicants: Patrick T. Coffey, who received &#8220;$81,463 during the last fiscal year&#8221; for his services. ...","og_url":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2009\/08\/20\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\/","og_site_name":"AntiPolygraph.org News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/AntiPolygraph.org","article_published_time":"2009-08-20T10:30:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-05-18T17:03:27+00:00","author":"AntiPolygraph.org","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ap_org","twitter_site":"@ap_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"AntiPolygraph.org"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2009\/08\/20\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2009\/08\/20\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\/"},"author":{"name":"AntiPolygraph.org","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/369226985d60d0cd81bc388f32f13fc0"},"headline":"Is Patrick T. Coffey Fit to Be Screening Police Applicants?","datePublished":"2009-08-20T10:30:52+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-18T17:03:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2009\/08\/20\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\/"},"wordCount":110,"commentCount":1,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["Patrick T. Coffey","polygraph screening","San Francisco Police Department"],"articleSection":["Polygraph"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2009\/08\/20\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2009\/08\/20\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\/","url":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2009\/08\/20\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\/","name":"Is Patrick T. Coffey Fit to Be Screening Police Applicants? - AntiPolygraph.org News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-20T10:30:52+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-18T17:03:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2009\/08\/20\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2009\/08\/20\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2009\/08\/20\/is-patrick-t-coffey-fit-to-be-screening-police-applicants\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Is Patrick T. Coffey Fit to Be Screening Police Applicants?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/","name":"AntiPolygraph.org News","description":"Original reporting and commentary about polygraphs, voice stress analyzers, and other purported &quot;lie detectors.&quot;","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#organization","name":"AntiPolygraph.org","url":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/polygraph-quackery.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/polygraph-quackery.jpg","width":1355,"height":799,"caption":"AntiPolygraph.org"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/AntiPolygraph.org","https:\/\/x.com\/ap_org","https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/antipolygraph.bsky.social","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/AntiPolygraph"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/369226985d60d0cd81bc388f32f13fc0","name":"AntiPolygraph.org","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/352648b7de416838c71aefdde2aafa386ca68af8d96ef52138d397773bfbeff1?s=96&d=mm&r=x","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/352648b7de416838c71aefdde2aafa386ca68af8d96ef52138d397773bfbeff1?s=96&d=mm&r=x","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/352648b7de416838c71aefdde2aafa386ca68af8d96ef52138d397773bfbeff1?s=96&d=mm&r=x","caption":"AntiPolygraph.org"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog"],"url":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/author\/antipolygraph-org-administrator\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/335","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=335"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/335\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6742,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/335\/revisions\/6742"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=335"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=335"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=335"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}