{"id":2986,"date":"2001-06-01T15:00:03","date_gmt":"2001-06-01T20:00:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/?p=2986"},"modified":"2021-02-19T08:47:46","modified_gmt":"2021-02-19T13:47:46","slug":"espanola-officers-clerks-to-take-polygraph-test","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2001\/06\/01\/espanola-officers-clerks-to-take-polygraph-test\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;Espa\u00f1ola officers, clerks to take polygraph test&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"entry\">\n\n\n<p>The <em>Santa Fe New Mexican<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.santafenewmexican.com\/site\/news.cfm?newsid=1894097&amp;BRD=2144&amp;PAG=461&amp;dept_id=367954&amp;rfi=6\">reports<\/a> that a number of Espa\u00f1ola, NM civil servants will be forced to submit to polygraphic interrogation in the wake of thefts from City Hall. Excerpt:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>Two Espa\u00f1ola police officers, a city clerk and two police clerks will undergo polygraphs to determine whether any of them stole $1,800 and 3.3 grams of heroin from City Hall. Espa\u00f1ola Police Chief Wayne Salazar said he received a list of employees to undergo the tests from city manager Leonard Padilla.<br \/>Salazar would not release the names of those who will take the test.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>If these individuals were employees of a private company, the 1988 Employee Polygraph Protection Act would give them the right to decline these unreliable &#8220;tests.&#8221; Unfortunately, the protections of the EPPA are not extended to government employees.<\/p>\n\n\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Santa Fe New Mexican reports that a number of Espa\u00f1ola, NM civil servants will be forced to submit to polygraphic interrogation in the wake of thefts from City Hall. Excerpt: Two Espa\u00f1ola police officers, a city clerk and two police clerks will undergo polygraphs to determine whether any of them stole $1,800 and 3.3 &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[327],"class_list":{"0":"post-2986","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-polygraph","7":"tag-new-mexico","8":"anons"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2986","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2986"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2986\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2987,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2986\/revisions\/2987"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2986"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2986"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2986"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}