{"id":2863,"date":"2001-02-04T15:00:29","date_gmt":"2001-02-04T20:00:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/?p=2863"},"modified":"2021-02-17T14:02:01","modified_gmt":"2021-02-17T19:02:01","slug":"polygraph-unreliability-underscored-in-oregon-murder-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2001\/02\/04\/polygraph-unreliability-underscored-in-oregon-murder-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Polygraph Unreliability Underscored in Oregon Murder Case"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"entry\">\n\n\n<p>In an article entitled, <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20010413191500\/http:\/\/www.oregonlive.com\/news\/oregonian\/index.ssf?\/news\/oregonian\/01\/02\/lc_11soler04.frame\">&#8220;Key witness now prime suspect,&#8221;<\/a> staff writer Michelle Roberts of <em>The Oregonian<\/em> reports that Mr. Humberto Castro Soler, who testified that he watched Mr. James Bryant shoot a Salem woman and her boyfriend over a 1999 drug deal gone bad, is now the prime suspect in those murders. Mr. Soler had &#8220;passed&#8221; a polygraph &#8220;test&#8221; administered by a Portland police officer, while Mr. Bryant had &#8220;failed.&#8221; The following excerpt underscores the unreliability of polygraph chart readings and the dangers of placing any confidence in them:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p><strong>Polygraph questions<\/strong><\/p><p>Police have made no secret about why they relied on Soler.<\/p><p>He passed a polygraph test administered by Portland Police Detective Sgt. Glenda Leutwyler, a respected polygrapher who handles dozens of cases every year for the district attorney&#8217;s office.<\/p><p>Although polygraph results aren&#8217;t admissible in court, they are often used as investigative tools.<\/p><p>Without the test, no detective worth his badge would have hinged a high-profile murder case on the word of a man like Soler, who has spent most of his adult life in prison for a string of armed robberies and drug charges.<\/p><p>Soler was not offered a plea agreement until he passed Leutwyler&#8217;s polygraph Oct. 24, 1999. Police thought they&#8217;d solved their case, their confidence underscored when Clark, who insisted Soler was the shooter, failed Leutwyler&#8217;s exam Oct. 29, 1999.<\/p><p>But in recent months, three polygraph experts have challenged those results.<\/p><p>David Raskin, an Alaska-based polygraph expert Bryant&#8217;s lawyers hired in October, examined Soler&#8217;s test and deemed it inconclusive.<\/p><p>Raskin criticized Leutwyler&#8217;s results, saying that detectives were eager to believe Soler and &#8220;made great efforts to reassure (Soler) that they wanted and expected him to pass.&#8221;<\/p><p>Raskin also found different results for Clark&#8217;s polygraph test, saying it was inconclusive about whether she saw Soler shoot Pawloski, but truthful about seeing Soler shoot Schneider.<\/p><p>Leutwyler defended her results and discredits Raskin as a hired gun for the defense whom Bryant&#8217;s attorneys &#8220;had to go all the way to Alaska to find.&#8221;<\/p><p>At the request of Clark&#8217;s attorneys, Stan Abrams, a local polygraph expert, also analyzed Leutwyler&#8217;s charts. Using his own scoring method, Abrams found Clark&#8217;s polygraph inconclusive.<\/p><p>When Abrams scored the results using Leutwyler&#8217;s method, he arrived at the same results she did. Both methods are accepted by the American Polygraph Association.<\/p><p>Ken Simmons, a former Oregon State Police polygrapher who now runs his own business, also deemed the results inconclusive.<\/p><p>&#8220;My results were tending in the same direction as Leutwyler&#8217;s . . . but I didn&#8217;t think (Soler and Clark&#8217;s) reactions were high enough to reach a conclusion,&#8221; Simmons said.<\/p><p>He also underscored why polygraph tests are not admissible in court and perhaps should not be used as a primary foundation for a major criminal case.<\/p><p>&#8220;The fact is that with polygraphs, even if they&#8217;re done well, there&#8217;s always a chance for error,&#8221; he said.<\/p><p>Jenny Cooke, who represents Bryant, and other defense attorneys involved in the case accuse prosecutors of standing by Leutwyler&#8217;s results &#8220;at all costs.&#8221;<\/p><p>&#8220;I think the prosecutor&#8217;s office won&#8217;t charge Soler because they&#8217;re terrified that this case is going to blow (Leutwyler&#8217;s) credibility all to hell,&#8221; Cooke said. &#8220;And what does that say about all the other cases they&#8217;ve used her for?&#8221;<\/p><p>Multnomah County Chief Deputy Norman Frink said he couldn&#8217;t comment on an ongoing investigation, but &#8220;People can assume we&#8217;re not fools.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In an article entitled, &#8220;Key witness now prime suspect,&#8221; staff writer Michelle Roberts of The Oregonian reports that Mr. Humberto Castro Soler, who testified that he watched Mr. James Bryant shoot a Salem woman and her boyfriend over a 1999 drug deal gone bad, is now the prime suspect in those murders. Mr. Soler had &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[302,301,300,303],"class_list":{"0":"post-2863","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-polygraph","7":"tag-david-raskin","8":"tag-glenda-leutwyler","9":"tag-oregon","10":"tag-stan-abrams","11":"anons"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2863","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2863"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2863\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2864,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2863\/revisions\/2864"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2863"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2863"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2863"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}