{"id":2861,"date":"2001-02-02T15:00:41","date_gmt":"2001-02-02T20:00:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/?p=2861"},"modified":"2021-02-17T14:02:02","modified_gmt":"2021-02-17T19:02:02","slug":"shawnee-county-ks-approves-funds-for-polygraph","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2001\/02\/02\/shawnee-county-ks-approves-funds-for-polygraph\/","title":{"rendered":"Shawnee County, KS Approves Funds for Polygraph"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"entry\">\n\n\n<p>In an article entitled, <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20010203153900\/http:\/\/cjonline.com\/stories\/020201\/com_polygraph.shtml\">&#8220;Sheriff&#8217;s department to get polygraph equipment,&#8221;<\/a> Alicia Henrikson of the <em>Topeka Capital-Journal<\/em> writes:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>County commissioners approved the purchase of a polygraph instrument and polygraph training for a sheriff&#8217;s deputy on Thursday in a 3-0 vote at the county commission meeting. The cost for the instrument, training and a laptop computer is $17,900.<\/p><p>Undersheriff Dan Breci said that the main reason why the sheriff&#8217;s office wanted a polygraph is because the office wants to use it in its hiring process.<\/p><p>&#8220;We want to make sure we are hiring the best,&#8221; Breci said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In an article entitled, &#8220;Sheriff&#8217;s department to get polygraph equipment,&#8221; Alicia Henrikson of the Topeka Capital-Journal writes: County commissioners approved the purchase of a polygraph instrument and polygraph training for a sheriff&#8217;s deputy on Thursday in a 3-0 vote at the county commission meeting. The cost for the instrument, training and a laptop computer is &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[199],"class_list":{"0":"post-2861","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-polygraph","7":"tag-kansas","8":"anons"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2861","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2861"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2861\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2862,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2861\/revisions\/2862"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2861"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2861"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2861"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}