{"id":2826,"date":"2000-12-04T15:00:56","date_gmt":"2000-12-04T20:00:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/?p=2826"},"modified":"2021-02-16T05:19:21","modified_gmt":"2021-02-16T10:19:21","slug":"doe-agrees-to-fund-bingaman-urged-polygraph-validity-study","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2000\/12\/04\/doe-agrees-to-fund-bingaman-urged-polygraph-validity-study\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;DOE Agrees to Fund Bingaman-Urged Polygraph Validity Study&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"entry\">\n\n\n<p>A <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20001227092618\/http:\/\/www.senate.gov\/~bingaman\/Press_Files\/Press_by_Date\/Press_Release\/press_release_31.html\">press release<\/a> from Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-NM). Excerpt:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>Bingaman first suggested a comprehensive review of the science behind polygraphs last year when he opposed DOE&#8217;s plans for expanded polygraph testing of its employees. In October 1999, Bingaman proposed and won Congressional approval of an amendment to a key appropriations bill calling for the National Academies to study DOE&#8217;s polygraph rule. Afterward, he reached an agreement with DOE Secretary Bill Richardson that DOE would fund this National Research Council study.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A press release from Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-NM). Excerpt: Bingaman first suggested a comprehensive review of the science behind polygraphs last year when he opposed DOE&#8217;s plans for expanded polygraph testing of its employees. In October 1999, Bingaman proposed and won Congressional approval of an amendment to a key appropriations bill calling for the National &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[287,14,70],"class_list":{"0":"post-2826","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-polygraph","7":"tag-doe","8":"tag-national-academy-of-sciences","9":"tag-polygraph-screening","10":"anons"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2826","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2826"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2826\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2827,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2826\/revisions\/2827"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2826"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2826"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2826"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}