{"id":1016,"date":"2013-05-22T07:52:09","date_gmt":"2013-05-22T12:52:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/?p=1016"},"modified":"2013-05-22T07:52:09","modified_gmt":"2013-05-22T12:52:09","slug":"marisa-taylor-on-fbi-pre-employment-polygraph-screening","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/2013\/05\/22\/marisa-taylor-on-fbi-pre-employment-polygraph-screening\/","title":{"rendered":"Marisa Taylor on FBI Pre-Employment Polygraph Screening"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\"fbi-polygraph\"<\/a>Marisa Taylor reports <\/a>for McClatchy on the high failure rate of the FBI’s pre-employment polygraph screening program using, among other sources, a 198-page document <\/a>containing complaints of discrimination associated with the Bureau’s polygraph program. Excerpt:<\/p>\n

WASHINGTON \u2014 Thousands of job applicants come to FBI offices all across the country every year, eager to work for the top law enforcement agency in the U.S.<\/p>\n

But many of them have their hopes dashed, and it\u2019s not because of their work experience or education or criminal records. They\u2019re turned down because they\u2019ve failed their polygraph tests.<\/p>\n

The FBI\u2019s policy of barring job candidates who fail their polygraph tests clashes with the view of many scientists that government agencies shouldn\u2019t be relying on polygraph testing to decide whether to hire or fire someone. Experts say polygraph testing isn\u2019t a reliable indicator of whether someone is lying \u2013 especially in employment screening.<\/p>\n

Further, a little-known technical glitch in one of the leading polygraphs that the bureau and many other government agencies have used could give applicants who fail polygraphs even more reason to assert that they were inaccurately and unfairly labeled liars.<\/p>\n

\u201cI was called a lazy, lying, drug dealing junkie by a man who doesn\u2019t know me , my stellar background or my societal contributions,\u201d wrote one black applicant in Baltimore, who said he was told he qualified for a job except for his polygraph test failure. \u201cJust because I am young and black does not automatically denote that I have ever used any illegal drugs.\u201d<\/p>\n

Government agencies use polygraph testing not only to weed out job applicants but also to question criminal suspects and to determine whether sex offenders are complying with psychological treatment or probation.<\/p>\n

Although all polygraph testing is controversial, many scientists are highly critical of its use in job screening, saying it\u2019s especially prone to inaccuracies because the questions are often more vague than they are in criminal investigations and therefore they\u2019re more likely to provoke reactions from the innocent that might seem like deception.<\/p>\n

Adding to the skepticism, polygraphers have documented problems with the measurement of sweat by the LX4000<\/a>, a polygraph that the FBI and many other federal agencies and police departments across the country have used, McClatchy found. Polygraphers also interpret measurements of respiration and blood pressure for their decisions on whether someone is lying, but many see the sweat measurement as especially indicative of deception. The manufacturer of the LX4000, Lafayette Instrument Co. Inc., describes the problem as rare but it isn\u2019t able to specify what that means. The company also points out that other polygraphs that use the same technology might have the problem as well.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\nFor the rest of the story, see “FBI Turns Away Many Who Fail Lie-Detector Tests.”<\/a> (Actually, the article might better have been titled “FBI Permanently Bars from Employment All Who Fail Lie-Detector Tests.” There is no appeal process.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Marisa Taylor reports for McClatchy on the high failure rate of the FBI’s pre-employment polygraph screening program using, among other sources, a 198-page document containing complaints of discrimination associated with the Bureau’s polygraph program. Excerpt: WASHINGTON \u2014 Thousands of job applicants come to FBI offices all across the country every year, eager to work for …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[30,185,70],"class_list":{"0":"post-1016","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-polygraph","7":"tag-fbi","8":"tag-lafayette-instrument-company","9":"tag-polygraph-screening","10":"anons"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1016","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1016"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1016\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1019,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1016\/revisions\/1019"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1016"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1016"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipolygraph.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1016"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}