Monthly archives: February, 2011

The Inconvenient Issue of Alleged Anthrax Killer Bruce Ivins’ Polygraph Results

On Tuesday, 15 February 2011, the National Research Council made public its Review of the Scientific Approaches Used During the FBI’s Investigation of the Anthrax Letters, seriously undermining the Bureau’s case against U.S. Army researcher Bruce Ivins, whom the FBI maintains was the sole perpetrator of the anthrax mailings. Polygraphy was not among the scientific …

DoD Updates Polygraph Directive

On 4 February 2011, the US Department of Defense published an amendment (PDF) to Directive 5210.48 (“Polygraph and Credibility Assessment Program”). The amended directive reflects the transfer of DoD polygraph program management from the defunct Counterintelligence Field Activity (CIFA) to the director of the Defense Counterintelligence and Human Intelligence Center (DCHC), a sub-unit of the …

Mark Warner is paid by the polygraph lobby

It is almost seven years since D'Loughy wrote the D'laughable letter ordering, I say ordering Antipolygraph to take down the…

I would like to see the officers or CVSA analysts cross-examined on the stand along the lines of. "Do you…

Any other job, if you’re lazy and don’t do the job right, you’re fired. Why not lazy officers?

The police should take the time to investigate, but many officers are lazy and just want quick resolutions. Look at…