A Critical Examination of Converus Inc.’s Pseudoscientific “EyeDetect” Lie Detector

An EyeDetect station

In “An Eye-Scanning Lie Detector Is Forging a Dystopian Future,” Wired science writer Mark Harris investigates “EyeDetect,” a new scientifically unproven lie detector being hawked as a replacement for the old scientifically unproven polygraph.

Converus Inc. of Lehi, Utah, which markets EyeDetect, claims without proof that it can detect lies with 86% accuracy. Mark Harris takes a critical look at this claim. Excerpt:

Sitting in front of a Converus EyeDetect station, it’s impossible not to think of Blade Runner. In the 1982 sci-fi classic, Harrison Ford’s rumpled detective identifies artificial humans using a steam-punk Voight-Kampff device that watches their eyes while they answer surreal questions. EyeDetect’s questions are less philosophical, and the penalty for failure is less fatal (Ford’s character would whip out a gun and shoot). But the basic idea is the same: By capturing imperceptible changes in a participant’s eyes—measuring things like pupil dilation and reaction time—the device aims to sort deceptive humanoids from genuine ones.

It claims to be, in short, a next-generation lie detector. Polygraph tests are a $2 billion industry in the US and, despite their inaccuracy, are widely used to screen candidates for government jobs. Released in 2014 by Converus, a Mark Cuban–funded startup, EyeDetect is pitched by its makers as a faster, cheaper, and more accurate alternative to the notoriously unreliable polygraph. By many measures, EyeDetect appears to be the future of lie detection—and it’s already being used by local and federal agencies to screen job applicants….

Read the entire article here, and if you missed it, be sure to also see Harris’ earlier article, “The Lie Generator: Inside the Black Mirror World of Polygraph Job Screenings.”

One thought on “A Critical Examination of Converus Inc.’s Pseudoscientific “EyeDetect” Lie Detector”

  1. I am absolutely DEVASTATED & ANGRY at having what would would have the been the best job of my lifetime…and these ridiculous “polygraph” machines are INACCURATE. I was 100% HONEST, down to every tiny aspect of both written and verbal responses. If they’re not 100% accurate, then why would any LE treat it as gold? Humans cannot explain every nuance of neurology, which also affects the eyes. I am blown away into the deepest despair, all because of absolutely irrational faith in a MACHINE. If I’m still around next week and calmer, I want to look into filing a Lawsuit against Converus “eye detect”. “I” DETECT BULLSH*T so they can make money.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.