Normal Topic A Public Challenge to Nelson Andreu (Read 6637 times)
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Offline


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 6220
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
A Public Challenge to Nelson Andreu
Mar 28th, 2003 at 2:29pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
In a 24 February 2002 Star magazine article titled "Star's Lie Detector Challenge to Michael Jackson" polygraph operator Nelson Andreu is quoted claiming that "[n]o one can beat [the polygraph]."

Andreu, a retired Miami detective who runs a company called Deception Check Polygraph and Investigative Services and was to polygraph Michael Jackson for Star, further claims that the polygraph is "very reliable," noting that "[t]o become an FBI agent, you have to pass a polygraph test." However, the recent report on polygraphy by the National Academy of Sciences states that "[t]here is essentially no evidence on the incremental validity of polygraph testing, that is, its ability to add predictive value to that which can be achieved by other methods" (p. 8-2).

Challenge to Nelson Andreu:

1) Publicly support your publicly-made claim that "[n]o one can beat [the polygraph]."

2) Publicly support your publicly-made claim that the polygraph is "very reliable."

If you cannot credibly support your claims to Star magazine, then please retract them.

This challenge will be notified to Mr. Andreu by e-mail to Info@DeceptionCheck.com.
  

George W. Maschke
I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time.
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
Threema: A4PYDD5S
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Offline


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 6220
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
Re: A Public Challenge to Nelson Andreu
Reply #1 - Mar 28th, 2003 at 2:38pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
I have sent the following e-mail to Nelson Andreu <Info@DeceptionCheck.com>, and copied to both Star magazine <letters@starmagazine.com> and Dr. Richardson:

Quote:
Dear Mr. Andreu,

In a Star magazine article titled "Star's Lie Detector Challenge to Michael Jackson" and dated 24 February 2002, you are quoted as claiming that "[n]o one can beat [the polygraph]." I'm a co-founder of AntiPolygraph.org (http://antipolygraph.org), a non-profit, public interest websited dedicated to exposing and ending polygraph waste, fraud, and abuse. We make a free book called The Lie Behind the Lie Detector available that, among other things, explains precisely how to beat the polygraph:

http://antipolygraph.org/lie-behind-the-lie-detector.pdf

Your claim that no one can beat the polygraph is contradicted by the available peer-reviewed research on polygraph countermeasures, which is cited in The Lie Behind the Lie Detector. This evidence suggests not only that that the polygraph can be beaten, but that even experienced polygraph operators cannot detect the countermeasures used to beat the polygraph.

This being the case, I challenge you to publicly support your publicly-made claim that no one can beat the polygraph. One way to do this would be to accept Dr. Drew C. Richardson's longstanding polygraph countermeasure challenge, details of which you will find here:

http://antipolygraph.org/cgi-bin/forums/YaBB.pl?board=Proc&action=display&num=10...

Perhaps Star magazine would be interested in covering this.

You also claim that the polygraph is "very reliable," noting that "[t]o become an FBI agent, you have to pass a polygraph test." But a recent report by the National Academy of Sciences (http://www.nap.edu/books/0309084369/html/) found that "[t]here is essentially no evidence on the incremental validity of polygraph testing, that is, its ability to add predictive value to that which can be achieved by other methods" (p. 8-2). This being the case, I further challenge you to publicly support your publicly made claim that the polygraph is "very reliable."

Sincerely,

George W. Maschke
AntiPolygraph.org

PS: this message has been copied to Star magazine and to Dr. Richardson, and will be posted on AntiPolygraph.org message board, where you are welcome to respond:

http://antipolygraph.org/cgi-bin/forums/YaBB.pl?board=Policy;action=display;num=...
  

George W. Maschke
I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time.
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
Threema: A4PYDD5S
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box orolan
Especially Senior User
*****
Offline



Posts: 363
Joined: Dec 25th, 2002
Re: A Public Challenge to Nelson Andreu
Reply #2 - Mar 28th, 2003 at 5:33pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
I know who this guy is. He once had an article posted on the Florida Polygraph Assoc. website about countermeasures. Gist of it was that during a maintenance poly, he allegedly detected signs of countermeasures being used. A subsequent search of the guy's home found materials on how to perform countermeasures, and he was sent back to prison. I sent an e-mail to Nelson asking a simple question, that being "Did the search also turn up any evidence that the examinee was re-offending?" Needless to say, I never got a response back.
  

"Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." &&U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
A Public Challenge to Nelson Andreu

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X